Talk:The Great Patty Caper

The Great Patty Caper was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 7, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Television: Episode coverage / Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Great Patty Caper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 22:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having a look. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking time to review this one! :) Mediran (t • c) 07:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here are some issues with the article.

In the episode, the key to the vault holding the Krabby Patty recipe got lost got -> gets per WP:TENSE
Done. Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The plot should be re-written to be 100% in the present tense.
Done. Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick stupidly breaks Stupidly is a bit too colloquial. Mind re-wording?
Done. Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Krabs sends the Krabby Patty recipe to a far away vault for safe keeping so that Plankton can’t get to it. But when Mr. Krabs forgets the recipe himself he gives SpongeBob the key to the vault and sends him on a journey across the ocean to retrieve it. Things go bad when the key goes missing aboard the Oceanic Express train and SpongeBob must identify the culprit and get the key back before the Krabby Patty recipe is missing forever! This is a very long quote. Perhaps you should blockquote it.
Done. Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nancy Basile of the About.com, Paul Mavis of the DVD Talk, Billy Gil of the Home Media Magazine, and Roy Hrab of the DVD Verdict, you can remove the "the" from before the media. It's not needed.
Done. Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
was not positive on the DVD I feel "not positive towards the DVD" would be better.
Done. Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On hold. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taylor Trescott! First of all, thank you for reviewing this article. It's really appreciated. Anyway, I would like to suggest to "fail" this GAN as I feel it doesn't meet the criteria and it actually lacks on production info. I have thought of that before. BTW, this GA review already serves as a reference on how this article be better. It depends if you will "pass" or "fail" this and it's your choice. Thanks! :) Mediran (t • c) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]