Talk:The Harvest (2010 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. -- tariqabjotu 23:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]



The Harvest (documentary)The Harvest (2010 film)

Well, considering both of those examples are for films titled "Harvest" without the definite article, I had not noticed them. Then The Harvest (documentary) should be moved to The Harvest (2010 documentary film) as it is consistent with the naming conventions at WP:NCF, i.e. it is against consensus to use (documentary) alone as a disambiguator (see here). BOVINEBOY2008 13:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move again[edit]

As production,[1] distributor,[2] and multiple independent reliable sources [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] all seem to indicate that the film documents the 2009-2010 farm season for three teens, and was first released July 29, 2011. I've tagged this talk page with found sources and will boldly make the move to The Harvest (2011 film) in a few days. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 10:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like the proper move to make! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now having second thoughts toward efficacy of The Harvest (2011 film), though I still think a move is correct. When Template:Infobox film instructs "Insert only the most relevant release date(s) of the film", my initial thought was the sourcable 2011 theatrical release, as I believe per sources and reviews that 2011 as likely the most relevant. However, Template:Infobox film#Release dates states "Release dates should therefore be restricted to the film's earliest release, whether it was at a film festival or a public release, and the release date(s) in the country or countries that produced the film, excluding sneak previews or screenings". This had a limited but important screening September 16 2009, before lawmakers at a panel discussion at U.S. Department of Labor,[15] and did have several festival screenings in 2010 where it gained media recognition. However, now I'm thinking that despite the easily sourcable festival releases of 2010 and despite the sourcable IMDB theatrical release date of 2011, The Harvest (2009 film) is the proper move choice per guideline's instructions toward a film's earliest public release. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 17:18, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Many of the sources call the film The Harvest/La Cosecha. Would it work to disambiguate using Spanish La Cosecha, to avoid the need to specify the year? Per WP:SUBTITLES, as La Cosecha is included as a subtitle. Wbm1058 (talk) 02:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose As per the line under screenings "The Harvest premiered at the International Documentary Film Festival IDFA in Amsterdam in November 2010" which sources this too. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Unfortunately that claim is not properly sourced. While the article asserts November 2010 as a "premiere", all the non-independent source gives us is that it "screened",[16] and we already know it has screened earlier and had "premiers" in 2011. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Support move to article's original title of The Harvest/ La Cosecha per the multiple independent reliable source referring to this film BY that relevent and sourcable title. Interestingly, the production company tells us that as The Harvest/La Cosecha the film actually had its US premiere at the Full Frame Documentary Film Festival in April 2011.[17]. We have Post Chronicle speaking toward an Longoria TWEET about a June 2011 "national premiere": "She later tweeted a photo of herself on Capitol Hill, writing, "On the Capitol re-introducing the Care Act and getting ready for national premier of Harvest- great documentary about child labor in Us." And then we have an August 2011 source about a "Los Angeles premiere": "para la premiere en Los Ángeles de la película "The harvest" ("La cosecha")." And we have another source tellng us of a September 2011 premiere:"the documentary The Harvest/La Cosecha, produced by Eva Longoria, premieres tonight at 7:30PM"Even Metacritic offers numerous RS reviews in numerous sources as The Harvest/La Cosecha [18]. I support this move to original article title as a decent compromise and a valid disambiguation that does not require any continued arguments about multiple "premieres" or the facility or lack of using 2009, 2010, or 2011 in the film title. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move 20 August 2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Harvest (2010 film)The Harvest/La Cosecha – per discussion in Move again section above. Disambiguation by subtitle avoids issues of multiple premieres in multiple years. Submitting a formal RM to keep the ball rolling. – Wbm1058 (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.