Talk:The Last of Us Remastered/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AdrianGamer (talk · contribs) 04:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Initial comments[edit]
- The lead isn't summarizing the entire article because it haven't mention any information about the development of the game.
- Ellie (The Last of Us) is created. You may consider to link it somewhere in this article as well.
- In March 2014, information leaked concerning a release of The Last of Us on PlayStation 4 - It should be written in passive voice. You should change it to something like "In March 2014, information concerning a release of The Last of Us on PlayStation 4 was leaked"
- This enhanced version of the game features an increased draw distance, higher resolution character models - Personal opinion, not compulsory, but I would prefer something like "character models of higher resolution".
- In Remastered, character textures were increased by a factor of four, - Which four? Can have some very very brief information about that in the topic sentence.
- As development on the original game ended - Not necessary to wikilink "development of the original game ended". It has already linked once.
- which assigns a normalized rating in the 0–100 range - I honestly think that this isn't necessary. I think that everyone should be able to know how a score like this is assigned, especially when you have already mentioned 95 out of 100 afterwards
- Philip Kollar of Polygon appreciated the game's improved textures and loading times. - Polygon don't need to be italicized.
- Personal opinion, not compulsory, but you can include other reviewers into the video game review template by using the custom reviewer field
- Just a side note that this game is not included in Template:Naughty Dog
- You should fill in the n.a. field in File:The Last of Us PS3 PS4 comparison.jpg
- Can Source 1 be replaced by a secondary source?
- Source 19, Polygon don't need to be italicized.
- This game also won awards from The Game Awards and 15th Game Developers Choice Awards. It can be included in the end of the reception section as well.
Overall[edit]
A very well-written article.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Some very very minor issues is seen, so I am not going to leave it on hold. The Last of Us Remastered promoted to Congratulations.
- Thanks for your review, AdrianGamer! I've gone through and fixed some of your concerns, though there's some that don't really need changing (for example, Polygon should be italicised, as it's a website; it's not an organisation, like IGN). I should also note that the Good article template will need to be added to the article for the review to be complete. Thanks again! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 06:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)