Talk:The List (The Office)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 12:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    "who also portrays Ryan Howard on the series" should be "in the series"
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    people/characters names who are wikilinked in Production were already wikilinked in Plot; James Spader is wikilinked three times in the main part of the article; remove the overlinking; Hitfix and IGN shouldn't be italicized, as they are websites and not magazines; "losers." should have the speech mark inside the full stop
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    ref#4 is a bare url; please use the cite web template on it, with the name of the author, the title of the article, the publisher, the date published, and the retrievel date please
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    no problems here
    C. No original research:
    no problems here
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    no more cultural references throughout the episode?
Nope thats it NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts[reply]
  1. B. Focused:
    no problems here
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    no problems here
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    no problems here
  4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    there should be a screenshot taken from the episode to be used in the infobox
I don't quite understand how to due this NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts[reply]
  1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    no problems here
  2. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    please address the issues mentioned

I believe I've addressed all the issues NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts[reply]

alright then, it's a pass-SCB '92 (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]