Talk:The Master Genealogist/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
individual programs be listed in wikipedia
Should individual programs be listed in wikipedia? I mean, does that make it like a software directory, or sales catalog? WP:NOT#DIR Lifelinesszy 14:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete this article
It is taking me a while to try and build up a history of this program for an encyclopedic type article by going thru the mailing list and building up the history. Please Help me by letting me know exactly what you oppose? This program is very unique in the genealogy world in that it helps and allows the genealogist to research and collect conflicting information instead of being restricted to single events.
Gioto (talk) 01:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, in my opinion that doesn't make it even unique, much less very unique, whatever that means. Legacy Family Tree allows (encourages) collecting conflicting info as well; I don't know if there are other programs that also do so. That said, I think they both should have articles on Wikipedia. Informative, of course, not a sales pitch. Cheers, --Hordaland (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Just downloaded Legacy Family Tree to see if we are talking about the same thing and will get back to you. Gioto (talk) 00:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hordaland Thank you for pointing out that Legacy Family Tree can handle conflicting information. I agree that the articles should not be a sales pitch which is why this article is taking a while to write. Gioto (talk) 01:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)