Talk:The Monkey Suit/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ebe123 (talk · contribs) 11:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
A couple words to watch for, but used well
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
There is the plot, with no references, but put into a way that's not OR
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Together with Reverend Lovejoy he spreads the religious creationism belief in Springfield,... So there should be a comma after Reverend Lovejoy, and how about "the religious belief of creationalism"?
- Y Fixed. Theleftorium ^(talk) 16:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In "Ned walks off sadly, but Lisa explains that she respects and admire his beliefs, but feels that science and religion should never mix together and that Ned would not agree to evolution being taught in churches, a point upon which Ned agrees." the sentence is useless.
- Y Removed. Theleftorium ^(talk) 16:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Found nothing more. It's on hold for 1 day.
- Only one day? What if I hadn't been able to get on Wikipedia today? ;) Thanks for the review! Theleftorium ^(talk) 16:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, if that occured, I would be putting it on hold for 1 week. Just forgot to say. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 21:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 21:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]