Talk:The Philaletheis Society

The Philaletheis Society has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 5, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from The Philaletheis Society appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Philaletheis Society (production pictured) was Vassar College's first student organization?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Philaletheis Society.

Wikipedia

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Philaletheis Society/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 17:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 17:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 5, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: This article is indeed well-written. There is a bit of usage of commas, but not to the point of run-on sentences or overly long sentences, or anything of that nature, or something akin to this sentence itself, but I would recommend, after this GA review, for the next step, of getting some folks to help with passes of copy editing, ideally people who haven't seen this article before, or at least, not for a while.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources using in-line citations.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers multiple aspects of subject matter, including history from a good length of period of time, in addition to budget and operations.

4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutral and matter-of-fact tone throughout.

5. Article stability? I inspected the article edit history and talk page history, and found no outstanding issues or concerns with stability.

6. Images?: Three (3) images used, all hosted on Wikimedia Commons, all with appropriate licensing and information on their image pages.

Short n sweet n educational, nicely done. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]