Talk:The Prophesying Nun of Dresden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

The only source is always and alone Baschera!

It would be interesting to know if they exist and where the texts of this imaginary are preserved "Nun of Dresden" that nobody doesn't even know if has ever existed. The only one to the world that written of it (but without furnishing some documentation, location of the texts, bibliographies...) it is Renzo Baschera, the author of all the books on the prophecies of the "Nun of Dresden", of the "Black Spider", of "Rasputin" and of the "monk Basilio." I put everything among quotation marks because in any case Baschera has ever furnished original documents, and when he quotes them it doesn't furnish any indication to be able to retrieve them. In many they think that everything is invented. It is in this case it would be easy to make to fit the prophecies to the facts really happened. The whole page according to me would be to fill with tag "Without source", or better it would be still to totally cancel, in how much the only source is always and alone Baschera and anybody to the world can consult some original document to be able to verify. D. Cuochi

{{expand article}}

Here's the English translation of the original Italian article but I agree with Mr. Cuochi. I've been reading about prophets and German history for about 35 years. I've never heard of the Nun of Dresden until today, and I don't recognize the names of the Abbotts, Argoth and Koldan, and of the theologian Bruks, either – especially the theologian! Maybe the Nun of Dresden is a complete fake but you never know. So here's the translation, and let's see what happens next! --Brokal (talk) 01:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's pretty safe to say that this is simply historical fiction. I tried to clean it up a while ago to more clearly indicate that it was just a novel (pending any other sources), but it's still not great. Feel free to make that clearer. --Bobson (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...then the king of another island (that happened in 1720, in Sardinia), and the “king of the mountains” (which, however, did not happen). I think it was one event not a sequential, both king of another island and king of the mountain. Wasn't the Kingdom of Sardinia included the Savoy area which a mountainous area? Xbypass (talk) 12:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]