This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I removed the following sentence for lack of evidence: "Micklethwait and Wooldridge, as the U.S. editor and Washington correspondent for The Economist, are not able to provide a disinterested perspective on their subject matter, as British politics is much more left-leaning than American politics, and British journalists (such as those at the Guardian) often try to interject themselves in American politics in order to sway political outcomes (see the 2004 election)."
I agree with your decision. I just finished reading the book, and found it remarkably evenhanded. Indeed, I thought that for a couple of Europeans, they gave the American Conservative movement a remarkably positive light, while not ignoring its warts. DesScorp (talk) 06:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
