Talk:The Rose of Jericho
The detail on track position vs time is not encyclopedia worthy.
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Fctchkr (talk · contribs) on 19 March 2010 with the comment: does not meet notability requirements It was contested by Nyttend (talk · contribs) on 2010-03-27 with the comment: Several references are present, so this may well be notable; it shouldn't be deleted unless as the result of an AFD |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
From the wikisong project- "Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for a prominent album or for the artist who wrote or prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." I'll go ahead and run it through an AFD.
The entire charts/critical reception section should be removed as it is not part of wikicharts to reference itunes or beatport chart trackings, and it is not referenced. The entire release and production, video sections are trivia/fancruft. If you remove this information, you are basically left with an article stub that just lists the release date and remixes. Which is hardly encyclopedia quality content. The btmusic links are self published sources(and dead links), the antimusic source is just a repost of a BT press release, note the (PR) at the beginning, and the btmusic link is just a short blurb of rumors on an unofficial fan site. I would say all of those are questionable as being legitimate sources. Fctchkr (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Rose of Jericho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090501131921/http://12seconds.tv:80/channel/BT to http://12seconds.tv/channel/BT
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)