Talk:The Saint Patrick's Day Four

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Anti-war Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

From St patrick's four[edit]

The Saint Partick's Four are a group of four non-violent peace activists, currently on trial in Binghamton NY, facing 6 years in federal prision and $250,000 in fines. They have been indicted on one count of Conspiracy to impede and officer of the United States of America. Their trial stands to set a legal presedent as to the power of the government to prosecute dissent.

I deleted this info and redirected to this article.Travb 05:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD[edit]

The article survived an AfD. The discussion can be found here. enochlau (talk) 23:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Saint Patrick's Day Four. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071222074708/http://law.loyno.edu/faculty/bio/quigley to http://law.loyno.edu/faculty/bio/quigley

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Dispute[edit]

This article appears to have been written by persons sympathetic to the cause of the members described, as their interactions with law enforcement are not properly engaged with and the focus of the article appears to lie in advertising the personalities and beliefs of those involved rather than presenting their actions from a neutral perspective. For those interested, I am somewhat sympathetic to their cause but think the presentation of this article violates the NPOV spirit. Pbritti (talk) 20:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]