Talk:The Second Supper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ad Copy / Prune[edit]

Reads like an advertisement. Do we need to know where the owner works? Also, half the citations are from the organization's own website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.180.1 (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance?[edit]

Request that the subject be given a rating of "Low" on the WikiProject Wisconsin Importance scale; subject matter is a local paper with printed circulation below 3000 (thus making the 300,000 readers-reached comment not only improbable, but possibly misleading) out of a town of less than 60,000 people in rural Wisconsin.

If the subject is to remain on Wikipedia at all (though one could argue it does not satisfy satisfactorily the notability criteria), let us at least designate it at its due level of relative obscurity.

207.230.220.110 13:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've rated the article as requested. --Gimme danger 21:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The paper has developed more of a presence on the internet, posting music interviews with bands like Hanson, Bang Camaro, and Jackyl on its website and posting links to the pieces. The Hanson article is featured on their own website, and by itself has drawn thousands of unique views. Links to music reviews have drawn many more hits from over 70 countries. This article may not be of high importance, but certainly deserves to exist. 68.113.253.202 (talk) 20:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Just how notable is this? The site is down now.17:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)BlueworldSpeccie (talk)