Talk:The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

Why does Inside Politics redirect to the Situation Room? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.205.237.79 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy Dispute[edit]

In all honesty, why isn't the section with the quote of Wolfe saying "These people are so poor .... and so black" (well, alike to that statement) valid in this article? It is a rather controversial statement and it did occur during a broadcast of The Situation Room if I remember right. Chris 21:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a controversy[edit]

It is the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.32.172.177 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Stewart[edit]

I deleted excessive space devoted to Jon Stewart's lampooning of Blitzer's show. This article is not a place to recite, almost word-for-word, Stewart's jokes. One sentence saying that Stewart is a notable critic of The Situation Room is enough. ask123 (talk) 13:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversy" section[edit]

I've removed the section introduced by this edit by "Brotman wed" (contribs) due to unsubstantiated fact and poor formatting. The citation in the edit only states that the Clinton administration did not remove "W"'s from keyboards, but there weren't any citations regarding The Situation Room referencing this fact. Paragraph's written in a fairly biased tone, as well.

If you see the contribs by that user, you'll also find this edit on Major Garrett, which was later removed with reasoning similar to mine.

-Mike Tigas (talk) 05:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There must be a topic that the whole nation feels strongly about besides race. If people would quite talking about about it maybe things would fall into place.

How about drugs. I just paid $670.00 for fifteen pills. Why? Because there is no generic for these pills, my doctor said I need them if I want to stay awake during the daylight hours, and I can afford them. But, what happens if I could't?

That isn't the only one. I have pain meds. Now one would think they would bve regulated by the doctor, but NO. UNited Health Care reserves that right for themselves. It doesn't matter what the doctor prescribes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.35.97 (talk) 23:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why does "Inside Politics" redirect here?[edit]

"Inside Politics" was a different show that was cancelled when this show began. I am wondering if anyone has any rationale for the redirect. Wickedjacob (talk) 10:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

International Edition[edit]

2007[edit]

CNN International does not anymore show The Situation Room, and it has been replaced by AC360.210.4.42.189 07:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008-2013[edit]

It was there at various time after or before AC360, or Larry King Live, or Piers Morgan. Or at an earlier slot.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.200.51 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013[edit]

I watched it daily but recently it seems to be gone from schedule (CNN International, Eastern Europe)??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.200.51 (talk) 12:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014[edit]

I have not seen it in 2014 on CNN International. The text should then be amended with info when it was removed (or why, if someone knows). Perhaps it was too informative, and not sexy enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.200.51 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump - naturally[edit]

Can anyone tell me(America) if Donald Trump, really knows - or appreciates - the fact that IF he is elected, he will have to divest himself and hand over control, of his empire? How could he possibly endure not running his own businesses, or interests////

Gene Hafford.... 108.9.209.122 (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

President Meeting with Putin.[edit]

Mr. President when it comes to talking with Putin, or any other world leader, you have the Royal Straight Flush, we are America and you represent us ! We are the best in Technology, We are Strong in the Military. You are there to make demands, not beg, or buckle down under pressure. Mister President tell them Lead follow or get the hell out of the way . Tell Putin that they are within the Missile Range from North Korea; either stop North korea, or get out of the way. Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaquar85 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The Shituation Room" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Shituation Room. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu 57 14:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]