Talk:The Splasher

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I am very surprised that no one has started this article yet. This could really use a picture, if anyone has a fair use image. Slugmaster (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Speedy Deletion[edit]

I started this article when I was studying up on the history of the Splasher. While searching for "The Splasher", in quotes, on google comes up with 14,000 hits, there was no wiki article, so I started one. The Splasher was covered in international news magazines, including multiple articles in the New York Times, which went so far as to publish his/her entire 16-page manifesto. I fail to see how or why this warrants speedy deletion.

If you are not convinced, please see the following:

[1] NYT
[2]NYT
[3]NYT
[4] New York Magazine
[5] Guardian

I could continue for a while citing articles on why this should be kept. Slugmaster (talk) 07:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the primary complaint, "The reason given is: It is an article about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7" has been rectified, so I am removing the tag. Slugmaster (talk) 08:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Splasher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]