Talk:The Tin Woodman of Oz

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

Oz (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OzWikipedia:WikiProject OzTemplate:WikiProject OzOz articles

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Animals in media (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles

"Meat glue" vs "magic glue"[edit]

Hello Oz freaks and Wikipeople! Forgive me for abusing the TALK page to ask a question which doesn't necessarily affect the article, but if I don't learn the answer to this question soon, I will go mad and need to be put into a rubber room and kept under sedation.

The first edition of The Tin Woodman of Oz, and all subsequent editions right up to the large paperback which I owned in the 1970s, refer to the glue which Ku-Klip the tin-smith used to stick body-parts together and construct Chopfyt, as "meat glue". I was so intrigued with the idea that when I was dungeon-master in a game of Dungeons & Dragons (which was a new thing in the 1970s) I had my players find a treasure with some meat glue in it, introducing a new magical item into our D&D lexicon.

But today, the books in the stores, and the online stuff at Gutenberg, all say "magic glue" instead of "meat glue".

Can someone PLEASE tell me who made the decision to change it, and when, and why? I search and search online and I cannot find the answer. Thank you, HandsomeMrToad (talk) 02:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for sales--original research?[edit]

Although the question of why The Tin Woodman of Oz (and several other Baum books) sold so well in 1914 is a very interesting one, the association with WWI sounds like original research, if I am correct in thinking that the cited book, The Generation of 1914, does not mention Baum specifically, but rather merely talks about trauma and possibly about nostalgia. If the book does in fact mention sales of this book as an example, this should be made more clear than it is currently. It seems to me that a more plausible explanation would be the fact that many if not most of the girls who read The Wonderful Wizard of Oz as children when that book was published in 1900 would now have small children of their own. But that would obviously be MY original research, and should not be mentioned in the article. It seems sufficient to note the increase in sales without speculating on the cause, unless, as I said, the cited book does in fact touch on the matter.--Matt Thorn (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]