This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles

Journalism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles

Organizations

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles

United States

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Criticism[edit]

I've just removed two items from the "criticism" section, because they violate WP:RS. (Both were quotes from http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/wallst1.htm, which is a copy of a 1998 article from the LaRouche movement.)

We are now left with one item of criticism, an article by someone named Max Sawicky. It arguably fails WP:EL and/or WP:RS; I've left it in mostly as a placeholder, in the hope that someone will find and add at least substantive, citable critique of the Editorial Board. Please? CWC(talk) 18:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Motmot 10:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Motmot. (I made some changes to your contribution, though.) I've dropped the Max Sawicky link. Cheers, CWC 15:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely looks tighter than before - thanks. For completeness, though, here's realclimate.org on the WSJ editorials and documented mutterings on many matters from fair.org - a 1995 article. Motmot 09:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Redux[edit]

The criticism section of this, as detailed above, has been compleetly gutted. Considering that the main WSJ page notes that its own news division calls its editorial division 'Nazis' this seems a clear case of editor political bias. 71.195.87.156 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:13, 4 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

James Taranto[edit]

It looks like the list of editorial board members lacks the name of James Taranto. (Tom Nally, New Orleans, entered 12-November-2011.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.50.50.2 (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

It has been suggested that The Wall Street Journal editorial board be merged into The Wall Street Journal. I agree per WP:CFORK and WP:DICDEF, as they are essentially duplicates with same subject, with the same scope. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, please merge. This is definite FORK. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OP has been blocked for socking. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge for the given reasons. ~~Gamingforfun~~³⁶⁵ 05:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I support the merge. This page serves no purpose. All the information in it can easily be put in the main WSJ article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]