Talk:The Woman Hater (1910 Thanhouser film)

The Woman Hater (1910 Thanhouser film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 11, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Woman Hater (1910 Thanhouser film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 10:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I should have this to you soon ☠ Jaguar ☠ 10:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments[edit]

The could be expanded a little to summarise the article better and comply per WP:LEAD. Could you mention something about its production and release? A little should do
"The film was released on June 14, 1910, but is not know to have been reviewed" - known
"The single reel drama, approximately 1000 feet in length" - this could be converted into metres using the conversion template
"It was the Powers film that was rediscovered in New Zealand in 2010" - is this referring to the other Woman Hater film?

References[edit]

No dead links

Close - promoted[edit]

I couldn't find anything that would disrupt this review so after looking through it again I can tell that this article stays faithful to its references. The prose is generally good although this article would benefit from clarifying the above comments, but I see nothing major that would constitute putting this on hold. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 15:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]