Talk:The house with angels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Objection[edit]

Dear Kevo327, I kindly ask you to remove the PROD and reinstate the deleted material. The materials we can later discuss, if you are still not convinced about it.

1. Objection to the PROD. I believe that the article should not be deleted. It is an architectural monument of history and culture of Azerbaijan. 2. Objection to the removal of the material from the Article. I checked the source and can confirm that it contains the mentioned material under number 3270.

--Abrvagl (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Abrvagl I kindly ask you to read my reasoning and research it (WP:GNG and WP:NBUILD) I did check the list several times, searching it in Azerbaijani, searching the year, checking all the buildings in Baku. I even tried to check it now and it isn't there, there is no number 3270 in it either. There are no sources to prove your first point. Even the cultural heritage list doesn't have it. I would gladly remove the prod if it were otherwise. - Kevo327 (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I am really doing research, I would not object you if I did not do research. For example I not mentioning 3rd source, as I still doing research on it. I acknowledge you that I object the WP:PROD of this article. First time I WP:CONTESTED incorrectly. I forgot to notify you and did not placed {{Old prod}} tag. Can you please remove PROD and add old prod?
It is in the source: "3270 Yaşayış evi 1893-1899-cu illər N.Rəfibəyli küçəsi, 26". It is not recorded under the name of "The house with angels", that is why you probably could not find it. You can reconfirm that number 3270 is The house of the angels by the address also https://goo.gl/maps/Ht7RxQjDjBVKxp2t9. Abrvagl (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think this should go to AfD now, I agree with Kevo that the article fails WP:GNG. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kevo, can you please restore material 1 that you have removed? As I mentioned above, the building really is mentioned in the provided source. Thanks in advance. Abrvagl (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abrvagl, Sorry for the delay, after your correction I did find it and it's there. I apologize for the misunderstanding. I reverted it and added a hidden comment for future editors. Thank you for your feedback. - Kevo327 (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]