Talk:Theodore Sturgeon Award

Theodore Sturgeon Award is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on May 25, 2015.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 26, 2013	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Novels: Short story / Sci-fi High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as High-importance).

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page does not distinguish between the top 3 places and/or honourable mentions vs finalists[edit]

I'm not at all familiar with this award, but it seems there is a discrepancy between how works are listed here, versus what it listed on the pages associated with the award, and ISFDB and SFADB.

Here, one work each year is explicitly marked as the winner, and a number of others are listed in a seemingly arbitrary order.

However, as far as I can tell from the other sites, what actually happens is:

1. A number of works are announced as "finalists" 2. Some time later, a winner is declared, along with second and third placed runners up, and possibly honourable mentions. (Although per ISFDB, as far as I can see, only one year - 1995 - had both finalists and honourable mentions.)

I don't see any indication of these runner-up or honourable mention concepts on this page.

e.g. as per the official (?) press release http://www.sfcenter.ku.edu/news.htm#130, in 2018, the winning work was "Don't pPress Charges and I Won't Sue", second place was "And Then There Were (N-One)", and third place was "A Series of Steaks". In this Wiki page, that latter pair appear 7th and 8th in the 2018 section.

See also http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_category_year.cgi?768+2018 (which does show 2nd and 3rd places) and http://www.sfadb.com/Theodore_Sturgeon_Memorial_Award_2018 (which doesn't, although it seems SFADB is inconsistent - some years do have them, some don't).

I don't know of any other SF&F award that similarly has runners-up, so there's no precedent to point to, or design solution to copy, but it strikes me these runners-up and honourable mentions should be reflected here? ErsatzCulture (talk) 21:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The ordering of the non-winners is a bit strange, for sure- sometimes its alphabetical by title, sometimes its alphabetical by author, and sometimes its a mess. That should get standardized. I swear sfadb didn't use to list the 2nd and 3rd places (for this or the Campbell), but now it does (for 2016 and prior). The only award list I know of that records 1-2-3 is Dwarf Stars Award (which only reports the top 3 in the first place); maybe this list (+ the campbell) should add that? It'd take a bit of work, but not too bad. --Pres N 23:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]