Talk:This England (album)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 19:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- No DAB links, according to our tool [1] a few links will go dead in the future, so it might be worth wile to archive them. Outside of the GA criteria, of course.
- I am not sure how to archive links. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- File:This England, Oregon Symphony.jpg says it needs a FUR. I don't know if that applies to this article, but it is worth checking out. The other three files are OK, but it's odd that only the right-most file of the three is clickable.
- So something needs to be added that does not already exist within the "Non-free media information and use rationale" summary? I have been editing WP for years and I still don't fully understand FUR and image upload requirements! Happy to make any required changes if provided more specificity... --Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, and I added the link3 parameter to the template so that not only the third image is clickable. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- The lead seems wordy and runs on in spots, can you split or simplify some of the sentences?
- I split one of the sentences into two. Better? --Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Can you link "interlude"?
- To what? Interlude itself is a disambiguation page. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- The Portland Mercury invited people from the city's music scene to list "Portland's Top Five Records of 2012"; the reviewer known as "Angry Symphony Guy" (Brian Horay)[26] included This England at the top of his list. what is meant by "music scene"? Seems idiomatic to me.
- Good point. Now reads: "The Portland Mercury invited local music industry professionals to list..." --Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Otherwise, the article seems very well-written and easily passes the GA criteria. Albacore (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking time to review this article. Happy to address any additional concerns you may have. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Pass. Albacore (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. --Another Believer (Talk) 00:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- Pass. Albacore (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.