Talk:This Is the New Shit

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Iain Ellis (October 29, 2008). Rebels Wit Attitude: Subversive Rock Humorists. Soft Skull Press. p. 265 – via Google Books preview.
Jan Jagodzinski (August 19, 2005). Music in Youth Culture: A Lacanian Approach. Springer – via Google Books preview.

Dragon Age: Origins[edit]

As far as popular culture instantiations of this song, the new Dragon Age trailer had this song for background music. Is this worthy of mention? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.253.155.64 (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poppy?[edit]

Why do many critics and fans call this song poppy? I've been a Manson fan for quite some years now. It sounds just as heavy as many other of his songs! Plus, how can a song be poppy if it contains the lyrics "Babble, babble, bitch, bitch, rebel, rebel, party, party, sex, sex, sex and don't for get the violence!"?

I agree, i wouldn't call this poppy at all. But It doesn't matter what we think, but it needs a citation and you can't just make a blanket statement that it is seen as poppy, so imatakein' it out.TrevorLSciAct 03:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TITNS.jpg[edit]

Image:TITNS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Marilyn manson this is the new shit.jpg[edit]

Image:Marilyn manson this is the new shit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]