Talk:Tibetan sovereignty debate

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

UNDUE POV additions[edit]

MainBody, I have reverted your WP:UNDUE WP:POV additions made in the recent days. Please note that Wikipedia is written by summarising mainly WP:SECONDARY sources. Adding material from WP:PRIMARY sources to buttress a particular WP:POV is prohibited. You have made rather too many edits to take them apart. So blanket reversion is the only possible course at this time. You are welcome to reinstate edits based contemporary WP:SECONDARY sources, keeping in mind that this is a highly contentious topic, and a strict adherence to WP:NPOV is required. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I, without hesitation, reverted all your removals as you failed, on talk page, to list in details, one by one, which items fall under the category of primary sources and you even removed the optimized referencing i added regarding the Tang-Tibetan relation in the first paragraph. Per: wp:vandalism. MainBody (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ONUS and WP:VNOTSUFF. You are now WP:edit warring. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Take this edit for example. You have added the British Home government's view with an elaborate quote, but entirely omitted what Lord Curzon is supposed to have said. This is not WP:NPOV. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]