Talk:Tile Hill railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Coventry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coventry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CoventryWikipedia:WikiProject CoventryTemplate:WikiProject CoventryCoventry articles

Image[edit]

It is a nice picture, but the train obscures the railway station. Snowman 12:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced it with a picture of most of the station from the new road bridge. Snowman 09:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Early names[edit]

The dates and names given prior to this edit were consistent with those given in Butt (1995), pp. 15, 230 - that is: 9 April 1838 opened as Allesley Gate; 1 September 1863 renamed Allesley Lane; 1 April 1864 renamed Tile Hill.

The edit mentioned above was presumably sourced to this page which is self-contradictory regarding the pre-1864 names. The first paragraph has "Initially it was named Allesley Lane station and then in 1857 renamed as Allesley Gate" in the second sentence, but later reverses this to "Allesley Gate station renamed Allesley Lane". --Redrose64 (talk) 08:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going with what the source said. They can't both be right surely?! Are there any more sources? G-13114 (talk) 23:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that your source is self-contradictory. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]