Talk:Timothy L. Pflueger/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I fixed one

Link rot: I fixed one and tagged two dead links for which no archives could be located. diff.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   ...Pflueger designed some of the skyscrapers and movie theaters foremost in San Francisco... Shouldn't this be "...Pflueger designed some of the foremost skyscrapers and movie theaters in San Francisco..." or perhaps "principal" rather than "foremost"  Done

   ''Pflueger became thoroughly involved with SFAC's swirl of activities and was chosen director in 1914. "SFAC's swirl of activities" doesn't sound very encyclopaedic.  Done

   Overall this is very well written, just two slight concerns above

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All the refrences are to reliable sources, two dead links as noted above.  Done

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough and focussed

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Well illustrated, images correctly licensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for the issues noted above to be addressed. 13:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

   OK, all in order now. I am happy to list this as a Good Article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I have fixed the text problems you pointed out, and removed the dead URLs. Binksternet (talk) 16:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey! That was relatively painless. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 18:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)