Talk:To Save a Life

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

plot section[edit]

Does the plot section to anyone else seem like an advertisement for the movie? --Tyler John (talk) 15:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would not say advertisement. The last line especially. "he eventually saves the life of some other suicidal kid". I do fond that section especially wanting. I have not seen the movie, but my understanding from my friend's experiences with it is that there is much more to this plot. This summary makes i sound quite shallow, something that I am not sure it is. 75.69.129.253 (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disturbing Images?[edit]

This movie contains no blood at all It's everything but disturbing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.5.186 (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your deletion of this because it comes directly from the MPAA explanation of rating of the movie. Just because someone doesn't agree with it doesn't mean that it can just be deleted.71.117.236.129 (talk) 10:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on To Save a Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actual budget?[edit]

Half a million or "about a million"? - Both figures are quoted in the article (in different places). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuel Marks (talkcontribs) 10:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unbalanced Reviews?[edit]

Something I've noticed in this article is how many positive critical reviews there are in contrast to negative ones. Can somebody please try to balance them out?

--Neateditor123 (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123[reply]