Talk:Tom Quinn (Spooks)

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tom Quinn (Spooks) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
October 31, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
November 10, 2010	Good article reassessment	Not listed
Current status: Good article

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: Spooks Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spooks task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Shouldn't this be on the Disambiguation page?

Untitled[edit]

"The phrase Tom Quinn has now become an expression to define someone who refuses to pay their t.v. licence. For example "he is a right tom Quinn" The use of the phrase derives from the phrase tom-foolery and the word quinn meaning t.v. in irish."
I'm not sure how to move text, could someone point me in the right direction? (Very new to this...) Thanks DavidCh0 10:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC).

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tom_Quinn"

This contribution to the discussion page was deleted (with the rest of the page content) by 81.101.118.41 without comment. The page content it refers to had been deleted by another editor on the grounds that it was untrue. 81.101.118.41 reinstated it without comment. I am not impressed. DavidCh0 13:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rumours[edit]

Any sources on the mentioned rumour? Mainly because there have been rumours every year since 2004 about the original cast.. I'm going to remove it soon. ¬_¬ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwilso72 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In-universe[edit]

This is tagged as in-universe. Is the plot summary as currently is too in-universe? RJFJR (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tom Quinn (Spooks)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found Jezhotwells (talk) 21:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Macfadyen gained recognition for playing Quinn. Critical reaction towards the character were generally mixed, though fan reception was more positive. What sort of recognition? Perhaps these two sentences should be conflated.

Series creator David Wolstencroft believed that writing Tom was the most fun and most hard working because he was the centric character in the series, and he leads the stories. "most hard working"? Perhaps "and the hardest work"

Concerning Tom's relationship with Ellie, You can't start a sentence with "concerning"

When playing Tom Quinn, Matthew Macfadyen just followed what is scripted, and does not deviate by adding a biography of his character because he does not find doing so useful. Change of tense, inconsistent.

During production of the first series, Macfadyen, along with co stars Keeley Hawes and David Oyelowo were weary playing the lead and experienced characters in their mid-twenties, but since felt they earned the right to be in Spooks Do you mean "wary of", "weary" means tired.

While filming scenes for episode three and five of series one, Macfadyen burst a blood vessel on one of his eyes; in order to hide it, Macfadyen wore sunglasses while filming those scenes poor grammar.

OK, this fails on the reasonably good prose criterion.

Please take it away and get it copy-edited by someone with a command of good plain English. GAN is not a substitute for peer review.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Failed as badly written. Please take to peer review before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heading[edit]

"Reaction towards the character by fans were positive, though critics criticised Macfadyen's portrayal." == both claims need citations -- otherwise, they have no business being here. A little professionalism, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.119.28 (talk) 05:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Want citations? Look at the reception section, you'de find fans like the character but the critics don't, they're sourced. Lead sections do not require citations, they summarise the rest of the article. -- Matthew RD 14:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Role in final episode of tenth series[edit]

Is it worth mentioning his specific role in that episode, as the apparant assassin of the head of the Russian ultra-nationalist group? Fluffaduck (talk) 21:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Insulting comments by Newshound[edit]

Wikipedia is based upon mutual respect and everyone remaining polite. Changing the edit of Cziltang Mexico and citing "removed incomprehensible goober fan boy edit" as the reason is childish and infantile.

Don't like an edit feel free to change it, but don't act like a moron unless you want your account shut down.

--195.225.189.243 (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think being insulted counts as a proper reason for reversion. And also a lot of what was said was just speculating. All we really know for sure is that Tom arrives, meets with this guy, and the rest is left up to our imaginations. From the reviews I've seen, some believe he was going to assassinate him. Some others think differently. -- Matthew RD 17:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tom Quinn (Spooks)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 00:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues:

Character arc: Unlink Russia per WP:OVERLINK
Conceputal history: Should be a comma after "After a seven year abstance, in October 2011".

Good work, on hold for now. TBran dl ey 00:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for reviewing! -- Matthew RD 21:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tom Quinn (Spooks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714122237/http://www.moviefreak.com/dvd/m/mi5_vol1.htm to http://www.moviefreak.com/dvd/m/mi5_vol1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]