Talk:Tomato can

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So, it seems to me that the term "tomato can" actually means slightly different things in different contexts. I've read about a pair of brothers in Tennessee who each have about 20-300 records (yes, hundreds of losses) who generally box for about $100 per round, and almost always lose. Those types of fighters- they would probably be considered "tomato cans" if you had to look at the objective facts.

But it also seems that the term is also used when there is a large disparity in perceived quality between two fighters, especially when a champion is involved. For example- Ali's fight against Wepner was expected to be a fairly easy win for the champ, but it ended up being an exhausting marathon fight, instead of an easy 4 or 5 round KO win for Ali. Wepner had a winning record, something like a 75% win rate, which is very good. He was also the State Champion of New Jersey, which was one of the biggest boxing states in the country.

My point is- the guys with 15-179 records, those are not the same "tomato cans" that champions fight. A fighter who is a journeyman- when a champion fights him, the guy's called a tomato can, and I'd hope that the article might somehow explain that notion/concept. 150.108.235.22 (talk) 01:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Anon[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Tomato can (sports idiom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tomato can (sports idiom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]