Talk:Tommy Bahama

This article was nominated for deletion on February 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notablility & references[edit]

per AfD page:

A g-News Archive serach brings up over 3,700 articles [1]. Here are just four the numerous published works on this company - [2][3] [4] [5] --Oakshade 06:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

So why aren't they included in the article? Tagging {{unref}} until they are - Tiswas^(t) 16:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SPAM[edit]

Oh great... not only does this company get viral marketing through the Simpsons movie, but they get it here for free too. Seriously, this is spam. If they want ads, let them pay for them like everyone else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.50.171 (talk) 00:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Touchy, touchy.--Sirlearnsalot (talk) 00:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed most of the non-NPOV marketing drivel. It appears to have been added by User:Dyannhawkins.

--Robbins (talk) 05:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, endorsement by Homer Simpson is questionable, to say the least.--OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where does Tommy Bahama source their silk?[edit]

Where does Tommy Bahama source their silk? 2600:8801:BE2C:C400:FCE5:A63A:8E64:BD6 (talk) 09:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]