Talk:Tonka (fuel)

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Rocketry Mid‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the news: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/world/middleeast/12-years-later-a-mystery-of-chemical-exposure-in-iraq-clears-slightly.html Greg (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah the NYtimes, over a decade now and it is still claiming every substance found in Iraq was evidence of "chemical weapons". I wonder how they'd report on raiding your house? You have bleach at home right? Oh dear-"chemical weapons" evidence right there buddy. Putting their style of "reporting" aside, I suppose it is somewhat notable that US grunts didn't know what TG-02 referred to and they were also seemingly too busy not to google it before manhandling the barrels and exposing themselves to the vapors. I mean as you can see in the picture, the barrels literally had "TG-02" written on them, there was no need to "have a translator" present as they claim.

Still though, should we include the story? I'd like to, it's just I don't feel it's a good idea to use that specific reference. If you know of a more scientific or medical reference that details the effects of exposure to these unwitting "victims" in a less sensationalized manner, then add it to the article by all means as that would be valuable.

Boundarylayer (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Tonka (fuel)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Tonka (fuel)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "b14643-isayev":

From S5.4: Brügge, Norbert. "Spacecraft-propulsion blocks (KDU) from Isayev's design bureau (now Khimmash)". B14643.de. Retrieved 2015-06-02.
From A.M. Isayev Chemical Engineering Design Bureau: Brügge, Norbert. "Spacecraft-propulsion blocks (KDU) from Isayev's design bureau (now KB KhimMash)". B14643.de. Archived from the original on 2015-06-02. Retrieved 2015-07-30. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tonka (fuel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Buryan's donkey.[edit]

> the eventually abandoned Burya ICBM

The soviet Burya was not an ICBM per se, it was more like an SR-71 sized D-21, i.e. a huge ramjet powered drone aircraft, which flew horizontally at Mach 3-4 at high altitude over great distances, rather than being thrown on a ballistic trajectory. 77.234.84.169 (talk) 12:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]