Talk:Tory Burch/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   30-acre should be converted into decare. The lead is a little thin, and all sections should be mentioned, yet there is little on her personal life there, especially her adult part. The business part is fine in the lead.

   I don't know much about decares and don't see them at Template:Convert/list_of_units. I switched to hectares.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold—a little longer lead, and the decare thing, and it is a good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

   I am not sure how much more you want in the WP:LEAD. If you still want more, let me know.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

   Passing GA. You are right about the hectare—careful reading shows that the decare is only used in Norway and the Ottoman empire (guess where I am from). The lead looks great. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)