Talk:Totsukawa

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:41, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Districts and municipalities task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Remove information[edit]

Hi fellow Wikipedians,

I recently removed a lot of information found on this page due to it being of low importance to the reader. Remember, the purpose of Wikipedia articles is not to include everything, but to provide a general summary of the topic. Only information that is on topic with good citations should be used. For more details, see Wikipedia:Scope.

That is not to say that the information that used to be on this page is useless. Rather, I think a lot of it could warrant their own articles provided that they have good sources backing them up. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. BigBryan0 (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Massive amounts of lost information[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Totsukawa&diff=prev&oldid=857246257

Last version with the information. I think it would be due to restore a lot of this and add sources. Nobody complains about landmarks being listed for Los Angeles or San Francisco or claim its irrelevant there. DarmaniLink (talk) 10:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]