Talk:Toyonaka

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:16, May 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Districts and municipalities task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move 25 October 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 11:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toyonaka → Toyonaka, Osaka – recent move removed "Osaka", but WPMOS on Japanese places outside major cities (Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya, Hiroshima, Yokohama... is that they use the prefecture name whether they are the primary topic or not Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per WP:PRECISE (MOS:JPPLACE doesn't appear to require disambiguation unless needed) and WP:2DABPRIMARY it gets way more views, [[1]], is more significant and has more than 30x the population of Toyonaka, Kagawa, which didn't even have a hatnote until I just added one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a new move, so you can use WP:RM/TR. 63.139.68.86 (talk) 19:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes technically but moves on similar cases such as Morioka and Yokosuka have been successful so this move was consistent with consensus. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Note that some core cities of Japan, such as Kanazawa, Nagasaki, Higashiōsaka, Matsue have remained at the undisambiguated title for years. Coupled with the two previous RMs removing the prefecture which was closed as move, I consider there to be consensus that the prefecture does not need to be included in the title unless disambiguation is required. feminist (talk) 03:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above WP:PRECISE and WP:CONCISE. Adding the prefecture is overly precise, and incorrectly implies there is another use of Toyonaka. --В²C ☎ 17:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

В²C, there is: Toyonaka, Kagawa. 63.139.68.86 (talk) 04:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but this one is primary for the name "Toyonaka" so per WP:PRECISE it should be at the base name, however you're correct that we do still have 2 "Toyonaka"s. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]