Talk:Traditional IRA/Archives/2016

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Traditional IRA/Archives/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class== Start class because this article needs more references. Further, this article needs sections on impact, history, and context.EECavazos 20:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC) ==WP Tax Priority== Low priority because this article is a subset of Individual Retirement Account, which would take the bulk of the traffic, and it is limited to one country.EECavazos 20:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC) I agree with the above, though I put it at Mid priority with the current scale because I felt a fairly large number of people would go to this vs Roth IRA in a comparison. I suppose we should check article traffic statistics to be sure. - Taxman Talk 17:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 17:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 09:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)