Talk:Training set

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robotics attention needed[edit]

  • Refs needed
  • Expand and check info

Chaosdruid (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

There is absolutely no value added of having two articles Training set and Test set separately when neither can be discussed alone. The concept is Training and test sets with references to information science, statistics, data mining, biostatistics, robotics, etc. Currently the two articles are near duplicates (or could be based on the available information. Can we imagine some information for either which is not relevant for the other? Sda030 (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree with the suggestion - training set, testing set and validation set are all parts of one whole and should be presented in one topic. (MM-Professor of QM & MIS, WWU-USA)