Talk:Transportation Expansion Project

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: Colorado Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Colorado
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article does not have a KML file. Please work with the Maps department to create and add a file for this article.

Advertisement label[edit]

I agree with the advertisement label. The entire thing reads like one written by the government officials who worked on it.

Things such as: The unprecedented project is the result of a unique collaboration and T-REX also is unique by combining light rail, highway, bike, pedestrian and other transit options, the project used a multi-modal approach to address some of the traffic problems. The multi-agency cooperation created an effective and efficient partnership. When all of these agencies worked together, they realized this complex project needed innovative approaches, which led to one of the strongest reasons why a design-build methodology was chosen. and it has four sections on benefits of the projects and it has an entire section talking about how light rail is better than HOV lanes... really?

Additionally, there is far to much concentration on policy.

More importantly, it marginalizes the two construction firms that actually did the work!

I suggest looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoover_Dam for how an article such as this should look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.67.137.245 (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Any insight from people in the Denver metro area, feel free to contribute. IronChef 13:09, 01 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Trex Logo.gif[edit]

Image:Trex Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Trex Logo.gif[edit]

Image:Trex Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why the person that put together the section of Pros for LRT didn't add cons for LRT? Prk166 (talk) 04:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lead[edit]

"7 wide" -- is this 7 lanes wide? Seven what wide? Mabsal (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/trex/
Triggered by \broadtraffic-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 21:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Transportation Expansion Project/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This is only a week old, looking for additional feedback and input from stakeholders from the project. IronChef 06:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 04:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Transportation Expansion Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://trexproject.com/trex_content/about/trex_2003_factbook.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019180438/http://constructor.construction.com/coverStories/archives/2006-05.asp to http://www.constructor.construction.com/coverStories/archives/2006-05.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trexproject.com/trex_channels/about/factbook.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trexproject.com/trex_channels/about/introduction.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trexproject.com/trex_content/about/trex_2003_factbook.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing on results[edit]

Hi, if anyone who's more familiar with roadway construction terms can think of a more encylopedic, neutral tone to explain the improvements, please do, thanks! 267 06:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]