Talk:Treehouse of Horror (The Simpsons episode)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hold. The nominator never put a nomination link on the talk page, the entire opening sentence has no references when there are a couple things that require references. Plot is a little cluttering. Production section too trivial and too long ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 05:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look, but can you be a bit more specific? For example, what needs to be referenced in the lead? And can you give an example of trivial information in the production section? :) TheLeftorium 09:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- There are two schools of thought when it comes to references in the lead. Some feel there should be no refs if it info that has a reference in the body, and some prefer refs even when it is ref'ed in the body. I don't care either way. If you want, I can ref every statement in the lead, or just specific ones, or none; up to you. I'm willing to cut the production section and work on the plot, but I would appreciate a little more direction so I know I'm going in the correct direction. Thanks. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I can see now about the references not being needed, and further review of the production section, I can see it now. I would say the the article is ready for good article status. By the way, I am the original reviewer, since the reviews I've changed my name and signature (verify) ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 02:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- There are two schools of thought when it comes to references in the lead. Some feel there should be no refs if it info that has a reference in the body, and some prefer refs even when it is ref'ed in the body. I don't care either way. If you want, I can ref every statement in the lead, or just specific ones, or none; up to you. I'm willing to cut the production section and work on the plot, but I would appreciate a little more direction so I know I'm going in the correct direction. Thanks. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
GA ready![edit]
The article has...
- An excellent, 3 paragraphed opening section
- Supporting material (infobox, photo)
- 3 very informative sections
- Short yet very detailed plot section
- Very informative, in sequence infobox
- Great External links
- WikiQuote box, portal link, navigation box
- Reliable references
- Appropriate amount of internal links
---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 02:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)