Talk:Tripoli Agreement

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chad.

Military history: African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force

Tripoli Agreement was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: August 10, 2006. (Reviewed version).

Tripoli Agreement thrown out the window?[edit]

Well, with the recent rebel attack at the Battle of N'Djamena, Chad has broken off all relations with Sudan. Can we consider this Agreement nullified? Elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (Be eudaimonic!) 21:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. KI 03:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added but the briefest mention of the above to the article. Please correct, expand, etc. David Kernow 22:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article[edit]

This page cannot be a good article anymore because:

It is not broad enough (debates are not covered, compromises are not included)
The cited sources are biased (debatable)
The article is full of red links.
There are no images (but many images would be ideal for the article)
The article has a pacifist point of view.

--GoOdCoNtEnT 07:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig[edit]

There is another Tripoli Agreement signed between the Republic of the Philippines and the Muslim rebels in Mindanao. --Bentong Isles 23:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]