Talk:Triumph Vitesse

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Triumph Vitesse article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hello people, I may be being pernickety, but why at the bottom are Triumphs under the Rover Marque? The Triumph Motor page states that the marque is owned by BMW, and as far as I know 'Rover' as an entitly was absorbed by BL in '67 (like Triumph, and others), and resurfaced in 1986. So strictly speaking no Triumph have ever been Rovers (or vice versa). Could lead to confusion for the uninitiated... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.9.14 (talk) 10:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Written like an advertisement?[edit]

This car hasn't been made in the last 51 years. Mwanner | Talk 18:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External link[edit]

@Andy Dingley, can you help us understand how this external link complies with WP:EL, particularly the WP:COPYVIOEL section, as it looks like a link to a scan of a proprietary brochure which is stored on a personal blog website. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are, of course, welcome to delete this per strict policy and I won't oppose that. However it's 65 years old, a marketing document that has always been intended for wide public distribution, and Triumph is one of the car makers with the least clear current ownership of their IP (it's not a simple matter to say 'BMW bought it all'). Andy Dingley (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]