Talk:Trojitá

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trojitá article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software.

Lack of independent sources[edit]

Quotes from the developer don't count as third-party sources. To help other editors, perhaps most (or all) of those links should simply be deleted. Then we can see if there is anything left. TEDickey (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please point out what would you like to add and/or change? In particular, I do not expect that there might ever be any other source for e.g. how Trojita started simply because I never talked about that. Or am I supposed to let someone else edit the wikipedia just to prevent that "original research"? Or is the rule "nobody else writes about the history -> not interesting -> remove that section"? Jkt (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your questions are addressed in various guidelines: WP:Notability, WP:COI and WP:RS are a good place to start reading. TEDickey (talk) 00:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was largely unaware of the WP's consensus of using secondary sources (which, especially with computer software, tend to offer an often uninformed view on the subject matter). I've replaced some of the links with secondary sources now, so I've removed the warning from the article. Jkt (talk) 08:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]