Talk:Tropical Storm Agatha (1992)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 08:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

• what's "10 direct"?
  • It states that 10 people died from the hurricane directly, it is in most WP:WPTC articles.
• "As it moved northbound northwards" northbound is an adjective, but we need an adverb.
  •  Done YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• "Agatha was steered toward the north"
  • Fixed. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• A bit picky, but I suggest "and stayed remained at sea"
• FN 6, why's "National Hurricane Center" italicised while others above and below it aren't.
  • Beause that ref is a template
• "The center of the storm promptly became ill-defined on infrared satellite imagery" I don't get the "ill-defined on infrared satellite imagery" part.
  • Changed to poorly. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• Does "forecasters" need to be wikified?
  • Why not? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• "heavy rains" redirects to a video game. I don't think it should be wikified at all, since it's not technical.
  •  Done. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• "Mexico" and "landfall" are wikified multiple times.
  • I don' think they are in the same section. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• "Gased Times" should be formatted as The Gadsden Times.
  •  Done. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• "The News" should be italicised.
  •  Done. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane}
• date formatting should follow one style, either YMD or DMY.
  • I made it in DMY to be consistent with other WP:EPAC articles. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
• Dablinks reveals two occurrences of dabs.
  • Fixed the first and the second is project standards to have. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Assessment

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

End note

• No major problems. Very happy. Pass Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 04:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)