(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
A list of references appears at the bottom of the article as is appropriate.
Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
All sources appear to be reliable. Sources in the article include the National Hurricane Center (the tropical cyclone report, advisories, discussions, and tropical weather outlooks), the National Climatic Data Center (flooding events), and various credible newspapers.
Pass
(c) (original research)
It does not appear that any original research took place.
Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)
No copyright violations or instances of plagiarism were detected in the article.
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
All major aspects such as the met. history, preparations, Cuba impact, and US impact are present.
Pass
(b) (focused)
The article does an excellent job of discussing the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
The article appears to be neutral and does not give undue weight to any aspect.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
Looks to be pretty stable with no recent edit wars.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
All images have their copyright statues displayed on their pages.
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
All images have appropriate captions that accurately describe them. I fixed the total rainfall caption. Usually, "over" is used when making a reference to time. I changed it to "in" since it was referring to an area. The new statement reads, "Total rainfall associated with Alberto in the United States".
Overall, Alberto has a good structure. It is very balanced in the amount of coverage for each section. The only thing I could think of is to talk about the impact it had in Ontario, if any. If had anything worthy of mention there, it should be added. If not, please ignore the suggestion. Anyways, good job with preparing this article and I wish you the best of luck with future articles. Alberto is now a good article. Cheers, FigfiresSend me a message! 22:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for offering to review Figfires (talk·contribs). Can you ping me when you're done with the review? Thanks! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Pass