Talk:Tropical Storm Morakot (2003)

Tropical Storm Morakot (2003) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Tropical Storm Morakot (2003) is part of the 2003 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 4, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
October 27, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 8, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 703 cloud seeding missions took place in Fujian Province to increase rainfall following Tropical Storm Morakot?

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Morakot (2003)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 20:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 20:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*"The PAGASA consequently named the system Juaning for local purposes." Citation needed.

That should be it.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 02:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I just saw the [3] after a few sentences. Passing.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 02:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]