Talk:True North trilogy

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This page should be nominated for deletion. There is no information here that isn't on the pages for the three films, films which are barely of significance themselves at this point ("Tusk" failed to attract much of an audience, the 2nd film hasn't been released, the 3rd hasn't been made yet. Creating a page for the trilogy is jumping the gun.)Walterego (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Kevin Smith has become his own unreliable source. ←Ben Culture (talk) 16:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. now that Yoga Hosers exists, and will eventually make a profit in home-video sales and rentals, the "True North Trilogy" is 2/3rds complete. And if Smith could get both Tusk and Yoga Hosers made, Moose Jaws should ne no problem. The kind of people who invest in films like Smith's LOVE a simple premise like "It's Jaws with a moose." It like he said about Mallrats: "It's Clerks in a mall." That's all he had to say, and they gave him $6M to make it. Anyway, however disjointed and mismatching, this is a trilogy that will exist. Good enough. --Ben Culture (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, 1. Mentioning the failure of Tusk has nothing to do with the creation of this page. 2. Yoga Hosers was screened at Sundance, and is complete. 3. Moose Jaws is getting the its principal cast in place. 4. I believe the page is needed because its for a trilogy of horror films which is out of smiths realm of comfort or whathaveu.. I believe there's merit to keep the page, it jus needs to be supported by more reliable sources. I've been trying to add and find reliable sources for it but need some help from other editors. Your opinion means nothing and noting failures of Kevin has no weight. Npamusic (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree First-time Talker, long time Editor for my company Wiki Page - I'm reaching out to contribute here for 2 reasons. 1. I am intrigued by the idea of requesting someone to take down information. If the article is not offensive or completely fabricated/misleading, then why make this request? Also, do Administrators monitor the Talks and take down a page they deem has been approved for removal? I'm not sure if you can tag someone or direct a question at someone, but I'd like to ask: Ben Culture, why did you feel it was necessary to request the removal? (This is purely curiosity and not at all a critique.) 2. I wrote that I Disagree because, as I've eluded to in part 1. of my ramblings, I don't see why details at least moving in the direction of correct information should be removed. There's no such thing as "too much knowledge", right? Granted it be correct information :-P. Thanks in advance for the tips! ⬱ CJavas0226 (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC) Chelsea J.[reply]

Dear CJavas0226 -- I am not the one who requested the removal. In fact, now that Yoga Hosers exists, and isn't going away anytime soon (all of Smith's films earn back their budget, and turn a profit, in home-video rentals and sales), it lends some notability to the "True North Trilogy" concept, and I think I might change my vote from "Agree" to "Disagree". HOWEVER . . . If I do change my vote, it will be due to thought, not emotion. I am nearly 45, and you have no idea how annoying it is, to see IDEAS misportrayed at FEELINGS -- as in "why did you feel it was necessary to request the removal?" That's not a feeling. It's a thought. Not only was I not the one who requested it; I also based my support for it on my thoughts, not my feelings. Were you taught in school that all decisions are emotional, not intellectual? ←Ben Culture (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC) (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To anwser your "too much knowledge" question: Yes. Yes, there IS such a thing as too much information. There was a long, dark period when nearly every Wikipdeia article was cluttered up with references to Family Guy, South Park, and The Simpsons. As of right now, September 2015, "Come Sail Away" is still like that -- but what the hey, it's a pop song, so there will be pop-culture references. Problem was, every Wikipedia article was getting like that. --Ben Culture (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in view askewniverse?[edit]

view askewniverse article makes no mention that this is the view askewniverse. that's pretty authoritative to me. Yoga Hosers article says something dubious about "spin off [...] from view askewniverse". But Tusk article does not mention askewniverse. If they are all connected, all articles should be updated harmoniously. skak E L 18:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cast table[edit]

Why is there a cast table that lists the cast of Moose Jaws? We don't even know if this movie is going to be made and any cast details are subject to change as evidenced by Smith admitting that he removed Jay and Silent Bob from the script. 2601:18C:8201:7650:B92E:84A4:8532:4787 (talk) 07:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]