Talk:Trustee Act 2000/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Just to note that I'm partially done with the review, haven't found any problems yet. Sorry for the delay, getting burned out. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, here's a couple things:

"In Speight v. Gaunt, Lord Blackburn said that "as a general rule a trustee sufficiently discharges his duty if he takes in managing trust affairs all those precautions which an ordinary prudent man of business would take in managing similar affairs of his own", similar to an objective test." The quote needs a citation. Also, I changed the case title to v. gaunt with the period, but I'm not sure which version is correct for British case law; whichever it is, just as long as they're all consistent it's fine.
"Under Section 8 of the Act, trustees can purchase land "as an investment, for occupation by the beneficiaries or for any other reason"." Quotes need cites. There's a couple other instances of this in the article.
I was unaware that the guidelines required citations immediately after the quotes, simply after them; it's the first inline citation after the quote which refers to them. It's always a v rather than v., so I've changed that. Ironholds (talk) 12:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the case of the quotes, they at least have to be at the end of the sentence that the quote is in. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put it on hold and pass when everything's fixed. Shouldn't take long since there's not much to. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got them; poke me if there are any more. Ironholds (talk) 19:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I don't see any more problems, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]