Talk:Tug of war at the 1900 Summer Olympics/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Been ages since I've done a GA review...
- "comprised primarily of" → composed primarily of
- Any idea if the Herald refers to the Scottish paper, or The (Old) Sun?
Other than that, can't really fault this. Prose is fine, references are formatted consistently, no issues with dab or dead links. Two images hold appropriate licences. It's as comprehensive as it's going to get. Shall pass once you get back to me. Lemonade51 (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Lemonade51: Thanks for the review! That first one always catches me out - fixed it now. The latter was still referring to the New York Herald, I have clarified that in the article now. Harrias talk 13:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Will pass, nice work. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)