Talk:Tugun Bypass

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

6 lanes[edit]

I bet the bypass will need 6 lanes, not 4 lanes.

Opening of bypass[edit]

When the bypass will be completed in June 2008. The number of vehicles is expected to be 60,000 VPD (vehicles per day), so it whould need to be 6 lanes (3 in each direction)!!!!!

The "traffic lane rate" is:

  • 1,000 VPD to 3,999 VPD - Means you just require 1 lane in each direction (Silver City Highway for example).
  • 4,000 VPD - Means you need overtaking lanes at regular intervals (Great Western Highway west of Katoomba, is an example).
  • 10,000 VPD - Means you need a dual carriageway and 2 lanes minimum in each direction (the Pacific Highway another example).
  • 50,000 VPD - Means you need a minimum of 3 lanes in each direction (the F3 freeway for example).
  • 80,000 VPD - Means you need a minimum of 4 lanes in each direction (Pacific motorway north of Nerang, for example).
  • 120,000 VPD - Means you need a minimum of 5 lanes in each direction (I429 in New York, for example).
  • 150,000+ VPD - Means you need a minimum of 6 lanes in each direction (I45 in New Jersey, for example).

Removed text[edit]

I removed the following sentence: " Despite the 3 governments involved all stating a commitment to cyclists in their transport plans there will be no access for pedestrians and cyclists." This makes no sense at all as this is a highway and therefore no pedestrians or cyclists are allowed on it anyway, the sentence seems to be an attack on the government for not allowing pedestrians to walk on a highway! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.167.213.128 (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tugun Bypass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tugun Bypass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]