Talk:Tung oil

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Suggestion[edit]

Shouldn't somebody change the text "Song dynasty" to the link: Song_dynasty I would do it but don't want to make a mistake :)

Comment[edit]

Good Article, thanks for the info

Where produced?[edit]

Where in China is it produced? Badagnani 10:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an unlinked reference to "tung" as a product of Paraguay ("[Paraguay is the ... second-largest producer of tung.]") Is that referring to "tung oil? Waterflaws (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Food and Drink[edit]

I have removed the food and drink tag here because...... well, frankly it made no sense --UltraMagnus (talk) 07:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How edible/inedible is it? I hesitate to take a gulp out of the can I have, given that it has been diluted with turpentine ;) --GSchjetne (talk) 09:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but you can have it unless alergic to nuts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.7.164.36 (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

"For example, Danish Oil has been thought to have tung oil in it."[edit]

Thanks for the article; this couplet doesn't make sense: "Product packaging will usually clearly state if it is pure tung oil. For example, Danish Oil has been thought to have tung oil in it." I can't parse the second sentence as a logical example of the first sentence... Is the point of the second sentence that Danish Oil does not in fact have tung oil in it, and people have incorrectly believed it to have tung oil? Or that Danish Oil does have tung oil in it and states as much, but these sentences are awkwardly worded? In either case, the fact that people have thought that Danish Oil had tung oil in it is not an "example" of product packaging clearly stating (or not) that a product is pure tung oil, at least without further explanation. Chconnor (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. It was confusing. I just rewrote it; let me know if it is now clearer. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]