Talk:Tunnel No. 41

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

When was Tunnel 6 abandoned?[edit]

From memory, after Tunnel 41 opened it was a directional running deal where traffic in one direction used the new tunnel and traffic in the other used the old. It remained in use until it was abandoned as part of a project to increase tunnel clearance along the Reno-Sacramento grade to accommodate double-stack container trains, that was completed in the late 1990s. The thought being it would cost too much to rebore the old tunnel and the newer tunnel already had sufficient clearances. I can't find any sources for this, but can anybody else confirm it? Dave (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. I found several rr blog articles, but finally found an article in the Sacramento Bee that confirms it. The "old route" was in use until 1993. I'll fix the article. https://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article2571404.html Dave (talk) 17:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]