Talk:Tusk (2014 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Added Background section, Premise, and External Link to IMDB[edit]

Thought this should be added, this page also needs more sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npabebangin (talk • contribs) 00:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cult Status??[edit]

Editor TregRyder001 (talk) has been adding a line claiming that Tusk has achieved cult status. Without any references to support this, I feel that line is inappropriate, and feels like original research that is attempting to deflect attention away from the negative reviews and poor box office the film achieved upon release. Rockypedia (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TregRyder001 (talk) deleted this comment without explanation. Please see WP:TALKO as to why this is unacceptable behavior. Specifically, this part: Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request. Rockypedia (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree, there's more to achieving cult status than just being a box office failure. Walterego (talk) 01:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While it should be referenced properly, it is in bad faith to assume the worst intentions from the editor. It could very well be cult status and the editor is simply inadequate at properly supporting via Wikipedia formality. Remember good faith and stay professional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:7601:7D57:A843:7169:B382:F547 (talk) 03:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]