Talk:Typhoon Maysak (2015)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Naughty Jeffrey (talk · contribs) 04:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
I review it again. As it is a powerful pre-April tropical cyclone, it causes some impacts, and they are clearly shown in the article. Good job! --Naughty Jeffrey (talk) 04:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
I will now pass this article. --Naughty Jeffrey (talk) 06:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Post-closure comment[edit]
This review has not been conducted properly, as it is not based on the Good Article criteria, as all GAN reviews must be. I am therefore reverting the approval, and requesting that Naughty Jeffrey refrain from future reviewing until he gains far more experience at Wikipedia and in the area of Good Articles, perhaps by creating and improving his own article and going through the nomination process from the other side.
Last month, Naughty Jeffrey approved some GANs, including this one, without even using a review page like this one: they were all reverted as this one is being reverted. Posts were made to his talk page, pointing out the issues; it appears that he didn't understand the gravity of what he did then. Good Article is a very serious process, and requires reviewers who understand the process and can properly examine the article and its sourcing. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)